Shannen Muhl
Shannen Muhl is an interdisciplinary artist and art researcher working across painting, digital processes, and installation. Their practice examines how meaning emerges through embodied experience rather than a single fixed interpretation. The human form is a central element of their practice, treated as unstable, compressed, distorted, and in flux rather than as a fixed or representational body. Figures function as sites of pressure, where sensation, memory, and perception are concentrated and distorted through material and spatial conditions.
Alongside their studio practice, their research interrogates how artistic value is constructed, who is granted authority to interpret art, and how hierarchical systems treat the layperson. Theory and making are treated as inseparable, with form, context, and content remaining in constant negotiation rather than hierarchy.
Rather than offering explanation, the work prioritizes encounter. Viewers are invited to engage physically and intuitively before interpretation is imposed. Meaning is not prescribed or elevated by institutional authority but generated through interaction and lived experience. If the work remains unresolved, it is intentional. Uncertainty is positioned as an active and necessary space for interpretation.
The FCC & LPC
This paper examines the production of artistic value through a critical reassessment of how meaning circulates across institutional, social, and interpretive structures within the contemporary art world. Framing art as fundamentally relational rather than inherently objective, it employs two created models: the FCC scale (Form, Context, Content) alongside the LPC scale (Layperson, Practitioner, Connoisseur) to articulate how value emerges through interaction between artworks, witnessing subjects, and the systems that mediate access. These models reveal the mechanisms through which institutional authority, critical discourse, and economic structures often privilege professionalized and connoisseurial perspectives while marginalizing lay interpretation.
Methodologically, the research integrates theoretical critique with qualitative inquiry, including an interview with a curator at the Gallery of Modern Art in Glasgow. This case study demonstrates how local art establishments operate within shifting economic constraints, ethical expectations, and evolving public roles, while simultaneously reproducing structural hierarchies through curatorial procedures, governance systems, and modes of interpretation. Visual diagrams throughout the study map the relational dynamics of FCC and LPC, clarifying how imbalances in form and context redistribute interpretive authority.
The findings argue that monetary value functions not as a determinant of artistic significance, but as a secondary proxy shaped by market logic. Rather than rejecting institutions or expertise, the research reframes them as participants within a broader ecology of meaning in which the layperson occupies a central, not peripheral, role. Ultimately, the FCC and LPC frameworks offer a reflective toolset enabling artists, institutions, and audiences to recognize how decisions regarding form, presentation, and discourse structure inclusion, access, and cultural legitimacy. In doing so, the research advocates for a recalibration of art valuation that prioritizes cultural, experiential, and relational significance over authoritative, financial, and institutional validation.
Click the image to read further
Secret Words in Red
This heart is sore. I spoke my years, through recalling unburied truths hidden, and now done. This heart isn’t silent. I’m still more yellowed.
Scars tell only reckless yesterdays I lived in. Various ended days, pressure accumulated in nerves.
Art never dissolves.
Want expresses anxiety privately today.
After nothing done, walking into something held to observe.
Endings stayed closed and pulled east to obscurity, and not explained why.
Lingering in frantic expectation. This, held in silence, I stayed marked young, through ruined unsaid things held.
An investigation into what I term the "animalistic default mode," a primal, instinctual drive to retreat into a compacted, fetal form during moments of extremity. This response, triggered by extreme trauma, comfort, or pleasure, reflects the body’s oldest survival programming. It recalls the embryonic origins of the human form, but within this context, the fetal gesture is not about regression, it is the seed of transformation.
The series unfolds as a progression, tracing the evolution of the self in the aftermath of rupture. The early works embody the moment of compression: the immediate, reflexive retreat inward. Forms are dense, folded, suspended in chromatic voids that echo the disorientation of trauma. As the series develops, the figures begin to shift and evolve. Compression gives way to subtle motion: ripples, torsion, asymmetry, but the figure evolves into a more recognizable form, hinting at internal restructuring. A new psychic form is assembling itself in the dark.
By the final works, the self is no longer simply surviving, but actively reconstituting. The compressed body becomes a new being entirely. Instinct and abstraction collide to form something new and more whole. Unbalanced horizon lines introduce a sense of pulse, of becoming. The paintings do not resolve neatly, but they gesture toward a threshold where a new self forms.
Inner, Outer, Center,Self
Amalgamation of Flesh
In Amalgamation of Flesh I & II, Shannen Muhl investigates the bizarre and often unsettling nature of the human form. Muhl describes the body as "these strange bags of flesh we inhabit, whose very essence becomes even more peculiar through what we do with them." This duality, simultaneously intimate and alien, forms the foundation of their exploration into themes of the uncanny, corporeal detachment, and the human desire for physical entanglement.
Drawing from the uncanny valley effect, Muhl paints fragmented, human-like body parts caught in moments of visceral entwinement. The forms writhe, push, and penetrate one another in ways that obscure their identity as human, abstracting them to a point where recognition teeters on the edge of ambiguity. This intentional distortion immerses the viewer in a space where the familiar becomes foreign, evoking both unease and fascination.
Through their use of abstraction, Muhl challenges the viewer to confront the inherent strangeness of the human body and its capacity for both connection and disconnection. The pieces provoke a tension between repulsion and allure, pulling the audience into an intricate exploration of flesh, form, and the complex relationships we hold with our own corporeality.
Time is but a Ripple
In Mind
Contact
If you wish to contact me please fill out the form below